To allow seamless copy-paste, on Ctrl+v, a SET_CLIPBOARD request is
performed before injecting Ctrl+v.
But when HID keyboard is enabled, the Ctrl+v injection is not sent on
the same channel as the clipboard request, so they are not serialized,
and may occur in any order. If Ctrl+v happens to be injected before the
new clipboard content is set, then the old content is pasted instead,
which is incorrect.
To minimize the probability of occurrence of the wrong order, a delay of
2 milliseconds was added before injecting Ctrl+v. Then 5ms. But even
with 5ms, the wrong behavior sometimes happens.
To handle it properly, add an acknowledgement mechanism, so that Ctrl+v
is injected over AOA only after the SET_CLIPBOARD request has been
performed and acknowledged by the server.
Refs e4163321f0
Refs 45b0f8123a
PR #2814 <https://github.com/Genymobile/scrcpy/pull/2814>
The interruptible version of the function to check process success
(sc_process_check_success_intr()) did not accept a close parameter to
avoid a race condition. But as the result, the processes were not closed
at all.
Add a close parameter, and close the process separately to avoid the
race condition.
On Linux, socket functions are unblocked by shutdown(), but on Windows
they are unblocked by closesocket().
Expose net_interrupt() and net_close() to abstract these differences:
- net_interrupt() calls shutdown() on Linux and closesocket() on
Windows (if not already called);
- net_close() calls close() on Linux and closesocket() on Windows (if
not already called).
This simplifies the server code, and prevents a data race on close
(reported by TSAN) on Linux (but does not fix it on Windows):
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=836124)
Write of size 8 at 0x7ba0000000d0 by main thread:
#0 close ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1690 (libtsan.so.0+0x359d8)
#1 net_close ../app/src/util/net.c:211 (scrcpy+0x1c76b)
#2 close_socket ../app/src/server.c:330 (scrcpy+0x19442)
#3 server_stop ../app/src/server.c:522 (scrcpy+0x19e33)
#4 scrcpy ../app/src/scrcpy.c:532 (scrcpy+0x156fc)
#5 main ../app/src/main.c:92 (scrcpy+0x622a)
Previous read of size 8 at 0x7ba0000000d0 by thread T6:
#0 recv ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:6603 (libtsan.so.0+0x4f4a6)
#1 net_recv ../app/src/util/net.c:167 (scrcpy+0x1c5a7)
#2 run_receiver ../app/src/receiver.c:76 (scrcpy+0x12819)
#3 <null> <null> (libSDL2-2.0.so.0+0x84f40)
The function sc_cond_timedwait() accepted a parameter representing the
max duration to wait, because it internally uses SDL_CondWaitTimeout().
Instead, accept a deadline, to be consistent with
pthread_cond_timedwait().
Commit 21d206f360 added mutex assertions.
However, the "locker" variable to trace the locker thread id was read
and written by several threads without any protection, so it was racy.
Reported by TSAN.
Romain Vimont
RipleyTom
Andrea Gelmini